Featured Post

Free Books - Index

Reading remains a gateway to learning and personal development, making the study of books indispensable in contemporary society. “Are the ...

Muslims & Arab Unity

Peace Forum Network Mags
Nationalism versus Common Cause
Ashley Heacock
The George Washington University, 2010
Economics and International Affairs
Concentrations in the Middle East and International Economics
Thesis Advisor: Dr. Paul Hoyt-O’Connor
Free Books:
Arab unity is by no means a new idea, and strides towards greater cooperation have taken place throughout the history of the modern Middle East. From Pan Arabism, to Nasserism, to Islamism, no recent decade has ever gone without its own widespread notion of a single, collective community existing in the Middle East. After years of dialogue supporting the concept of Arab unity, however, what do Arab states have to show for it? The emergency Arab summit hosted by Qatar in March of 2009 after the Israeli siege on Gaza—which killed approximately 1,300 Palestinians, including more than 500 women and children1—displayed Arab disunity, disagreement, and disillusionment at their best. New alliances formed, with Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) on one side and Qatar, Syria, and Hamas on the other.2 Rather than joining together for a common cause that seemed so straightforward and nondivisive, the Arab states underscored their fluctuating rivalries and longstanding disagreements.

Ottomon Empire

Meanwhile, the region faces numerous challenges: Palestinians remain hostage to a repressive occupation, the state of Iraq sits somewhere between a police state and civil war, water shortages face many countries of the Middle East, a military—and possibly nuclear— standoff exists between Israel and Iran, economic hardship pervades much of the region while populations grow at alarming rates, and Islamic extremism threatens the entire region as well as the whole world. These foreboding factors have the ability to cause immense strife and conflict in the region if not confronted using all the resources and ingenuity of the collective Arab states. Moreover, if Arab states use these complex issues to place blame and acquire power rather than assist weaker neighbors and develop the region, hardship and violence may well prevail.

If history is to be our guide, what can countries of the Middle East learn from past crises to help them in the future? What causes Arab states to unite or disunite, and has “Arab unity” ever existed? If a collective will is necessary to solve the problems of the future, what does the past foretell: a grim or hopeful picture?
In order to answer these questions, I will attempt to understand how relationships between Arab states came to be and what forces impacted their actions and beliefs. I will look at three significant events in recent Middle East history and analyze why Arab unity failed or triumphed, then compare the three events and determine what factors had the greatest influence on Arab relations and actions. The countries I will analyze are: Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, and Syria because they have made up the core Arab countries in the past century. There is no guideline for what makes up the entire Arab nation, and it has varied across time, therefore, by limiting this paper to the six primary countries mentioned, the analysis should not be greatly distorted.

The events I will discuss are: the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, the 1973 Arab-Israeli War and Oil Embargo, and the 1991 Gulf War. I chose these three occurrences since they all took place on an international level and are not specific to any country. They also are spread out over time, allowing me the opportunity to track changes in notions of Arab unity. Furthermore, they are all unique in different ways, making for a well rounded analysis. For example, the 1948 War was the first true test of Arab unity and ended in dire failure; the 1973 War and Oil Embargo on the other hand displayed a substantial level of Arab cooperation; and the 1991 Gulf War actually took place between Arab states and involved foreign intervention.
As I progress throughout this paper, I will define Arab unity as:
“Arab states coming together for an agree upon cause,  each giving of  their resource and support for the common cause,  all staying united to realize cause’s fruitation and  maintaining relations after the cause has ceased.”
Each of the events I have chosen to focus on presents different causes, or goals, that states sought to achieve. Not always were the goals the same and sometimes they were contradictory. Other times, states did not give of their strength or wealth, or they did not stay on a set, common path. State relationships also fell apart at times after the cause was irrelevant and hostile feelings remained. Throughout this paper, therefore, I will refer back to the definition of Arab unity and pin point when it was that Arab states fit the description and came together, and when it was that they fell apart, meanwhile noting the reasons for such fluctuations.

I will begin my paper by explaining the origins of Arab unity. To the great surprise of many, the concept is a 20th century phenomenon and took decades of conditioning to take hold within the minds of Middle East residents. Following the brief history of Arab unity, I will transition to analyzing the three events I chose for this case study, starting first with the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and then continuing in chronological order. For each event, I will not discuss the wars themselves, but rather Arab state decisions and actions. I will look at all six countries individually, paying attention to motivations and interests, fears and desires. I will also apply the definition of Arab unity to each event separately and see which parts hold true. The last section of this paper will make comprehensive observations, picking out important factors that led to Arab disunity, and making general predictions about the future. In this paper, I argue that the only way for Arab unity to be present in the future is for a common cause to be held by all Arab states that is neither contradictory nor dissimilar, and that they all feel is in their best interest to pursue.

The concept of holding an Arab identity came about in the mid-late 1800s, when prevailing loyalties were to the Ottoman Empire, Islam, or local tribes (see Map 1 in Appendix). An Arabic literary revival centered around Lebanon, along with a growing demand by Muslim elites for greater autonomy in Arabic speaking provinces (because spoils of the Ottoman Empire were not reaching them) helped establish a never be fore known notion of Arab nationalism. Christians in Lebanon were highly influenced by European trends and worked to establish Arabic as a language that could be used extensively for learning, plays, novels, and media like it never had been used before. Furthermore, the Muslim elites asserted that only Arabs could bring
back the glorious days of past empires due to their keen understanding of the language of God3 and organized their supporters in Damascus. This initial awakening did not produce revolutionary effects, but it did plant an awareness among the public of their shared language. It also questioned the legitimacy of Ottoman rule.4
When Turkification and Zionism appeared, Arabism became even more tangible. Turkification came about from an increasing desire by Turkish speaking Muslims to emulate Western nationalism and reaffirm their “Turanian” ancient civilization. This movement, however, came at the expense of other languages in the Empire, notably Arabic, and also helped to further showcase divisions. Zionist settlers in Palestine also shook up the region, as an influx of Jewish refugees threatened to displace Arab populations. Nevertheless, popular opinion throughout the Middle East in the early to mid1900 s still supported being part of the Ottoman Empire and had “no vision of a postOttoman order.” Only a minority at this point desired. decentralization or complete autonomy from Ottoman rule. Keep reading >>>>>>>
https://www.academia.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The tragedy of the Arabs: 
A civilisation that used to lead the world is in ruins and only the locals can rebuild it.
A THOUSAND years ago, the great cities of Baghdad, Damascus and Cairo took turns to race ahead of the Western world. Islam and innovation were twins. The various Arab caliphates were dynamic superpowers—beacons of learning, tolerance and trade. Yet today the Arabs are in a wretched state. Even as Asia, Latin America and Africa advance, the Middle East is held back by despotism and convulsed by war.
Hopes soared three years ago, when a wave of unrest across the region led to the overthrow of four dictators—in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen—and to a clamour for change elsewhere, notably in Syria. But the Arab spring’s fruit has rotted into renewed autocracy and war. Both engender misery and fanaticism that today threaten the wider world.  Keep reading >>>> http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21606284-civilisation-used-lead-world-ruinsand-only-locals-can-rebuild-it

Muslim Unity:


Sources:

Read more:
·       RELIGION CAUSE WARS?
·       Learning & Science
·       Islamic Society & Culture
·       Women in Islam
·       Rise & Decline of Muslim
·       Sectarianism
·       Jihad: Myth & Reality
·       Takfir- Docrine of Terror
·       Tolerance
·       Rebuttal to  Anti-Islam FAQs
Power Politics, Conspiracies; Threat to World Peace: 
·    Pawns in the Game   
.     Arab Unity
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2F40674EF81FEE1D




  1. The Middle East needs love and unity more than ever

    harunyahya.com/en/.../the-middle-east-needs-love
    Nov 23, 2014
    The Middle East needs love and unity more thanever watch video, Adnan ... This bloodshed will not cease ...




  1. Muslim Ummah in the Modern World | Unity | Islamic ...

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=njf9NQafQxk
    Nov 3, 2014 - Uploaded by Islamic Reminder
    Muslim Ummah in the Modern World | Unity |Islamic Reminders. Islamic .... The Prophet said, "By ...




  1. Iran Today - Unity between Sunni and Shia Muslims in Iran ...

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjBKzyBRBgg
    Jan 7, 2015 - Uploaded by PressTV News Videos
    Iran Today - Unity between Sunni and ShiaMuslims in Iran (P.1) ... in contrast to theMuslim World, has ...

Related: God's Land Grant to the Jewish People - Conditional or Unconditional? By Thomas Williamson: Keep reading >>>>>

Zionist Christians: Useful tool for Zionist Jews

Trump’s decision to shift US embassy to Jerusalem points to that he could be Zionist Christian.  Christian Zionism is a belief among some Christians that the return of the Jews to the Holy Land, and the establishment of the State of... [Continue reading...]

Zionism contrary to Torah teachings: Torah Jews, Rabbi

What is Zionism? Zionism is a movement founded by Theodor Herzl in 1896 whose goal is the return of Jews to Eretz Yisrael, or Zion, the Jewish synonym for Jerusalem and the Land of Israel. The name of “Zionism” comes from... [Continue reading...]

Jerusalem, The Blessed Land: An Insight Through Bible, Qur’an & History – Salaam One سلام

US President Mr.Donald Trump has announced to shift US embassy to Jerusalem, supporting illegal occupation, against spirit of UN resolutions and world opinion. Palestine is the most complex geopolitical and religious issue, confronted by the humanity, which if left unresolved will... [Continue reading...]   or Download pdf 


The Thirteenth Tribe is a book that attempts to explain the origins of Eastern Europe's Jewish population,largely decimated by the Nazi onslaught during the Second World War. Koestler shows through extensive research, how a trading empire was set up by a tribe we know as the Khazars between the expanding power blocs of Christianity and Islam; how the people were converted to Judaism by their king as a way of standing apart from both, and how the people and their wealth were dispersed through the countries of Eastern Europe after the collapse of the Khazar Empire. It is a controversial history; because it challenges both the assumptions of Nazi philosophy and Zionism that the European Jews were racially different from the populations of the countries in which they later settled. Koestler, as a Hungarian Jew himself, was particularly interested in the major part the Khazars played in the founding of the Hungarian nation; a fact which later led to the tragedy of 1944, when the Nazis exterminated over half-a -million Hungarian Jews, who were virtually indistinguishable from their Christian neighbours. Keep reading >>>>
The Protocols purports to document the minutes of a late 19th-century meeting of Jewish leaders discussing their goal of global Jewish hegemony. Their proposals to engender such include subverting the morals of the Gentile world, controlling the world's economies, and controlling the press. The Protocols is still widely available today on the Internet and in print in numerous languages. The document reveals through the mouths of the Jewish leaders a variety of plans. For example, the Protocols includes plans to subvert the morals of the non-Jewish world, plans for Jewish bankers to control the world's economies, plans for Jewish control of the press, and - ultimately - plans for the destruction of civilization. The document consists of twenty-four "protocols".
The text was translated into several languages and widely disseminated in the early part of the twentieth century. Henry Ford published the text in The International Jew, and it was widely distributed in the United States. In 1921, a series of articles printed in The Times claimed the text as forged.  The document 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' "הפרוטוקולים של זקני ציון"  surfaced in the Russian Empire, and was first published in 1903. Keep reading >>>>
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SalaamOneسلام  is a nonprofit e-Forum to promote peace among humanity, through understanding and tolerance of religions, cultures & other human values. The collection is available in the form of e-Books. articles, magazines, videos, posts at social media, blogs & video channels. .Explore the site English and Urdu sections at Index
علم اور افہام و تفہیم کے لئے ایک غیر منافع بخش ای فورم ہے. علم،انسانیت، مذہب، سائنس، سماج، ثقافت، اخلاقیات اورروحانیت امن کے لئے.اس فورم کو آفتاب خان،  آزاد محقق اور مصنف نے منظم کیا ہے. تحقیقی کام بلاگز، ویب سائٹ، سوشل میڈیا، میگزین، ویڈیو چننل اور برقی کتابوں کی صورت میں دستیاب ہے.اس  نیٹ ورک  کو اب تک لاکھوں افراد وزٹ کر چکے ہیں, مزید تفصیلات>>>  Page Index - Salaam One 
 ..........................................................................
 مزید پڑھیں: 
  1. مسلما نوں اور علماء کے نام کھلا خط : آج کے حالات میں مسلم معاشرہ نظریاتی  ابتری اور انحطاط کا شکار ہے. مادہ پرستی، دہشت گردی، عدم برداشت، اور جہالت انسانیت، امن اور مذھب کے لیے خطرہ بن چکے ہیں- ان حالات میں صاحب علم و ذی فہم حضرات سے ممکنہ حل کی توقع کی جا سکتی ہے. ہمارا مقصد ہے کہ آپ کی توجہ ضروری حل پذیر مسائل کی طرف مبذول کرنا ہے تاکہ جلد حل تلاش کیا جا سکے- آپ کی توجہ اور مدد سے ہم کوشش کر سکتے ہیں کہ معاشرہ کو اس  گہری دلدل سے نکال سکیں. مکمل خط اس <<< لنک پر پڑھیں>>
  2. نظریاتی اور فکری کنفیوژن اور ممکنہ حل

  3. خطبات اقبال - اسلام میں تفکر کا انداز جدید Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam-  http://goo.gl/lqxYuw
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~  ~

Age of Reason

Thomas Paine rev1.jpg

Theist, Deist, Atheist, Agnostic:

A theist believes there is a God who made and governs all creation; but does not believe in the doctrine of the Trinity, nor in a divine revelation.

A deist believes there is a God who created all things, but does not believe in His superintendence and government. He thinks the Creator implanted in all things certain immutable laws, called the Laws of Nature, which act per se, as a watch acts without the supervision of its maker. Like the theist, he does not believe in the doctrine of the Trinity, nor in a divine revelation.

The atheist disbelieves even the existence of a God. He thinks matter is eternal, and what we call “creation” is the result of natural laws.

The agnostic believes only what is knowable. He rejects revelation and the doctrine of the Trinity as “past human understanding.” He is neither theist, deist, nor atheist, as all these are past understanding.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Age of Reason; Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology is a deistic pamphlet, written by eighteenth-century British radical and American revolutionary Thomas Paine, that criticizes institutionalized religion and challenges the legitimacy of the Bible, the central sacred text of Christianity. Published in three parts in 1794, 1795, and 1807, it was a bestseller in the United States, where it caused a short-lived deistic revival. British audiences, however, fearing increased political radicalism as a result of the French Revolution, received it with more hostility. The Age of Reason presents common deistic arguments; for example, it highlights what Paine saw as corruption of the Christian Church and criticizes its efforts to acquire political power.

Thomas Paine (1737-1809) -- writer and revolutionary -- best known for his writings supporting American independence, was indicted for treason in England in 1792 for his work The Rights of Man, defending the French Revolution. More than one English publisher was also prosecuted for printing The Age of Reason, where Paine argues for Deism [Deism; combines a rejection of revelation and authority as a source of religious knowledge with the conclusion that reason and observation of the natural world are sufficient to determine the existence of a single creator of the universe] and against Christianity and Atheism.

Thomas Paine wrote the populist pamphlet, Common Sense, a clarion call for American independence and democracy. Driven by desire for freedom and justice, Paine's thinking reflected French and English writers like Rousseau, Burke, Locke, others in the "philosophy" movement, today called The Enlightenment.

In defense of the French Revolution and as a response to Burke, who had promptly condemned the French rebellion, Paine wrote and published  The Right of Man, part I appeared in early 1791, part II in February 1792.

Guided by his ideals more than the facts of "Madame Guillotine" and "The Terror" under Robspierre, Paine declared that governments exist to guard the natural rights of the individuals unable to ensure their rights without government's help. Four key rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression. In Part I, he argued for a republic governed under a constitution with a bill of rights, elected leaders serving limited terms, and a judiciary accountable to the general public. He called for equal suffrage for all men, (a true fellow of his times, dear women, sorry) and the end of social divisions by virtue of birth or rank or economics or religion. In Part II, Paine suggested social legislation to remove class inequities.

Paine's fervent hope was that Rights of Man would inspire in England the same revolutionary thirst for independence from monarchy as Common Sense inspired in America. Instead, despite selling about 200,000 copies by 1793, the pamphlet was suppressed by the government of William Pitt, who was unable to get his hands on Paine (still a British citizen), since Paine was safe in France. Pitt had Paine tried in absentia before the loyalists, convicting Paine of treason. England outlawed its native son in December 1792.

Paine was intrigued by the philosophies, the French social thinkers and encyclopedia creators who upheld scientific reasoning over irrational religious dogma, who posited that the mind is great, capable of knowing anything in time with diligent research, who saw the cosmos as the creation of one rational God who set the universe in motion with natural laws at work, like winding the precision clockwork, then turning humanity loose to govern ourselves by becoming educated enough to exercise our free will with self restraint within democratic laws. These thinkers called themselves "deists." Defined by Websters as "One who believes in the existence of a God or supreme being but denies revealed religion, basing his belief on the light of nature and reason."

Paine completed and published his critique of religion, The Age of Reason, with Part I in 1794 and Part II in 1796. "I believe in one God, and no more," he begins, "and I hope for happiness beyond this life."

Paine was a deist, not an atheist.The Age of Reason profers his metaphysical beliefs. He saw God as first cause and designer of the universe. God is knowable through the sciences and mathematics, through use of reason and natural intelligence. (Experiencing God through his heart or transcendent spirit also concerned Paine, but as a man of the mind, certainty of God had to came through his brain.) Christians do not try to know God in a reasonable way, he wrote. They rely upon a Bible, riddled with inconsistencies, subject to interpretation, therefore fallible. He compared the mythology of the Trinity with the paternity of Zeus, still a provocative analogy. Having dispensed with Christianity, Paine spoke again about his deist God as the power and wisdom anyone can witness, evidenced "in the immensity of the creation, ...in the unchangeable order by which the incomprehensible is governed."

Thomas Paine died at age 70 in New York on 8 June 1809. He did not expect a Christian burial in sacred ground after The Age of Reason. So stories about deathbed repentance likely are propaganda. Paine was buried in a corner of his new Rochelle farm. A decade later in 1819, one of Paine's harshest critics during the Nineties, William Cobbett, apparently moved to atone for his attacks, had Paine's bones dug up and transported to England for re-burial under a patriotic monument Cobbett planned to build. Cobbett died in 1835 with the memorial never erected. His English probate court assigned the old bones to a receiver. The fate of Paine's mortal remains today remains a mystery.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Age of Reason
By  Thomas Paine
Table of Contents

Chapter I - The author's profession of faith
Chapter II - Of missions and revelations 
Chapter III - Concerning the character of Jesus Christ, and his history 
Chapter IV - Of  the bases of Christianity
Chapter V - Examination in detail of the preceding bases 
Chapter VI - Of  the true theology
Chapter VII - Examination Of The Old Testament
Chapter VIII - Of  the New Testament
Chapter IX - In what the true revelation consists 
Chapter X - Concerning God, and the lights cast on his existence and attributes by the Bible
Chapter XI - Of  the theology of the Christians; and the true theology 
Chapter XII - The Effects Of Christianism On Education; Proposed Reforms
Chapter XIII - Comparison of Christianism with the religious ideas inspired by nature
Chapter XIV - System of  the universe 
Chapter XV - Advantages of the existence of many worlds in each solar system
Chapter XVI - Applications of  the preceding to the system of  the Christians
Chapter XVII - Of  the means employed in all time, and almost universally, to deceive the peoples
Recapitulation
Source: http://www.ghazali.net/book9/Table_of_Contents/table_of_contents.html
Download as book:
Pdf: http://www.deism.com/images/theageofreason1794.pdf
Other formats: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3743



  1. Philosophy in the Age of Reason - YouTube

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt6fzekd3Ks

    Mar 11, 2013 - Uploaded by P-Daddy
    Mr. Pahl talks to his World History students at Bartlett High School about philosophy in the Age of Reason, the ...


  1. THE AGE OF REASON by Thomas Paine - FULL Audio ...

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycgkogD7Jw4

    Feb 22, 2013 - Uploaded by Greatest AudioBooks
    THE AGE OF REASON by Thomas Paine - FULL Audio Book | Greatest Audio Books - TheAge of Reason ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Critique of Judgement & Critique of Pure Reason are two major works by Emmanuel Kant. Kant 1724 -1804 was a German philosopher who publishes a number of works on ethics, religion, law, aesthetics, astronomy, and history. Kant’s Magnus Opus is  the Critique of Pure Reason (originally written in German with the title: Kritik der reinen Vernunft from 1781), aimed to unite European thinking with experience to move beyond what he understood as failures of traditional philosophy and metaphysics. He set  out to end an age of speculation where objects outside experience were used to support what he saw as futile theories, while opposing the skepticism of thinkers such as Descartes, Berkeley and Hume. Download the Public Domain versions of his works here as PDF ebooks (890 and 480 pages):


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Humanity, Religion, Culture, Science, Peace
Peace Forum Network
Books, Articles, Magazines,  Videos
Overall crossed 2 Million visits/hits
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Institute of Islamic Studies and Centre for Study of Society and Secularism

Peace Forum Network Mags
Asghar Ali Engineer is a rights activist and heads the two organisations, Institute of Islamic Studies and Centre for Study of Society and Secularism. He has authored or edited 44 books on such  issues  as  Islam and communal and ethnic problems in India and South Asia in general. Some of his work is available at http://ecumene.org/IIS/csss.htm

ON RELIGIOUS AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUECONVERSION AND ATTACKS ON CHRISTIANSINDO-PAKFRIENDSHIP - A NEW TURNISLAM ON THE EVE OF THE 21ST CENTURY
COMPOSITE CULTURE - CELEBRATION OF INDIAN UNITYPOLITICS OF VIOLENCETHE CONCEPT OF ISLAMIC STATEONE YEAR OF THE BJP GOVERNMENT AND THE MINORITIES
KOSOVO AND NATO BOMBINGDEMOCRACY AND ITS PROBLEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIESRECONSTRUCTION OF ISLAMIC THOUGHTDEMEANING SECULARISM
ISLAM AND SECULARISMMUSLIM WOMEN AND MAINTENANCE INDIAN MUSLIMS AND EDUCATIONWHAT I BELIEVE
MEDIA AND MINORITIESMINORITIESAND KARGIL CONFLICTISLAM AND PLURALISM MEDIA AND MINORITIES
PAKISTAN, JIHAD AND ETHNICITYTHE MINORITIES AND THE COMING ELECTIONSON METHODOLOGY OF UNDERSTANDING QUR'AN  ISLAMIC ETHIC 
COMMUNALISM AND COMMUNAL VIOLENCE--1999 THE PAKISTANI TEXT BOOKS AND HATRED AGAINST INDIA THE BJP AND ITS ROOTS IN GUJRAT SIGHTING OF MOON AND PROBLEMS OF MUSLIM CALENDAR 
NATION-BUILDING IN SOUTH ASIA -- PAKISTAN VIOLENCE IN KASHMIR AND DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS IRAN BETWEEN LIBERALISM AND ORTHODOXY MEANING OF ISLAMIC WORSHIP
NATION STATE AND IDENTITY POLITICSTHE BJP AND ITS TWENTY YEARSHUMANKIND'S RELATIONSHIP WITH NATUREMUSLIMS, MODERNITY AND CHANGE
MUHAMMAD (PBUH) AS LIBERATORKASHMIR -- CAN AUTONOMY BE A SOLUTION?MUSLIM WOMEN'S MAINTENANCE - SOME NEW JUDGEMENTSWOMEN AND PERSONAL LAW IN IRAN
THE BJP AND THE MUSLIM FACTORISLAM AND SECULARISMISLAM AND MUSLIMS IN INDIA- PROBLEMS OF IDENTITY AND EXISTENCENKASHMIR  IS PEACE POSSIBLE?
COMMUNAL RIOTS � 2000TVAJPAYEE'S STATEMENTS AND MEDIEVAL HISTORYTRAGEDY OF KERBALA AND IMPORTANCE OF MARTYRDOMSSTHE RSS  AN EVALUATION FROM THE MINORITY PERSPECTIVE
ISLAM AND MUSLIMS IN INDIA- PROBLEMS OF IDENTITY AND EXISTENCEON ABSENCE OF DEMOCRACY IN MUSLIM WORLDKANPUR RIOTS  A WAKE UP CALLON METHODOLOGY OF UNDERSTANDING QURAN
MUSLIM MIDDLE CLASS AND ITS ROLEMUSLIM WOMEN AND FAR REACHING CHANGES IN BANGLADESHINDONESIA  A COUNTRY IN TURMOILCAN VEIL BE ENFORCED?
ATTACK ON WORLD TRADE CENTRE AND ITS IMPLICATIONSON DEVELOPING THEOLOGY OF PEACE IN ISLAMMINGLING OF THE TWO OCEANS- HINDUISM AND ISLAMCLASH OF TERRORS?
PLURALITY OR POLARITY?ON THE CONCEPT OF COMPASSION IN ISLAMMALEGAON  RIOTS � A New Era of Violence?IS CONFEDERATION IN SOUTH ASIA POSSIBLE?
A BRIEF SURVEY OF COMMUNAL SITUATION IN THE POST  BABRI- DEMOLITION PERIODON THE MULTILAYERED CONCEPT OF JIHADCOMMUNAL RIOTS � 2001ISLAMIC WORLD AND CRISIS OF MODERNISM 
A NEW APPROACH FOR ISLAMIC WORLD NEEDEDTHE POLITICAL UNIVERSE OF ISLAMDEFEAT OF BJP IS DEFEAT OF COMMUNALISMON SUFI APPROACH TO ISLAM
BJP'S RIOT - FREE INDIAMINORITIES CANNOT BE AT THE MERCY OF RSSTHE TRAGEDY OF KARBALA AND ITS IMPLICATIONSGUJRAT  AN AREA OF DARKNESS
ALL IS NOT LOST IN GUJRATMYTHS ABOUT MUSLIMS AND THE GUJRAT CARNAGEDA'WAH OR DIALOGUE ROLE OF POLICE IN GUJRAT CARNAGE
COMMUNAL VIOLENCE AND ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETYSOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH TO ISLAMBOMBAY HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT  A LANDMARK JUDGEMENT ON TALAQ NO ELECTION IN GUJRAT FOR NOW PLEASE
ISLAM, GLOBALISATION AND FUNDAMENTALISMSROLE OF RELIGION IN SECULAR SOCIETY POLITICS, VALUE-ORIENTED, NOT POWER-ORIENTEDINTELLECTUAL APPROACH TO ISLAM 
ISLAM AND THE CONCEPT OF KAFIRON ROOTS OF COMMUNAL VIOLENCEA NEW BEGINNING IN KASHMIRRECENT RIOTS IN MAHARASHTRA
ISLAM AND NATIONALISMTHE BJP AND GUJRAT ELECTIONS TRUTH ABOUT GUJRAT CARNAGE -CONCERNED CITIZENS,  TRIBUNALS REPORT ON GUJRATSHARI'AH PUNISHMENTS (HUDUD LAWS) AND NATION-STATES
THE BJP SWEEP IN GUJARAT- A MOMENT OF REFLECTION FOR INDFUNDAMENTALISM AND TERRORISMRELIGION AND ECONOMIC JUSTICEAMBEDKAR, MUSLIMS AND PARTITION
COMMUNAL RIOTS -2002HINDUTVA AND MINORITIESINDIAN MUSLIMS  -- MYTH AND REALITYONE YEAR OF GUJARAT'S SHAME
IS SECULARISM DEAD IN INDIA?THE ROLE OF ULAMA IN FREEDOM STRUGGLEAMERICAN AGGRESSION AGAINST IRAQ -- WHO
IS TERRORIST?
ON SOCIOLOGY OF COMMUNALISM
NO JUSTICE NANAVATI, WHAT YOU SAY IS NOT CORRECTRELIGION AND COMMUNALISMMUSLIM WOMEN ON THE MOVEJUSTICE ABORTED IN GUJARAT
UNIFORM CIVIL CODE OR LEGAL PLURALISMFUTURE OF SECULARUSM IN INDIAARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS AND T
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Humanity, Religion, Culture, Ethics, Science, Spirituality & Peace
Over 1,000,000 Visits
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *